In a nutshell
- 🧱 Companies are adopting LEGO Serious Play to transform team-building, turning playful modelling into a shared language for strategy, culture, and problem-solving.
- 🧠It works through embodied cognition and metaphor, creating psychological safety; models externalise ideas so quiet voices contribute and assumptions can be challenged safely.
- 🛠️ Sessions follow a tight rhythm: warm-ups, individual builds, storytelling, then a shared system; roles include a facilitator, a sponsor, and participants who “think with their hands.”
- 📊 Reported outcomes include stronger alignment, faster decisions, fewer rework loops, clearer ownership, and improved cross-functional collaboration within 60–90 days.
- 🚀 Easy to start: minimal bricks, time-boxed prompts, the “everyone builds” rule, photos and labels, three actionable experiments—then scale with certified facilitation if needed.
For years, away days promised trust falls and awkward icebreakers. Now, a childhood favourite is stealing the show. Companies across the UK are turning to LEGO Serious Play, a facilitation method that transforms plastic bricks into a shared language for strategy, culture, and problem‑solving. It looks simple. It is not. Participants build models, tell stories, and map systems that words alone struggle to capture. The result is fast alignment and clearer decisions. Play, it turns out, is not the opposite of work but a powerful route to better work. From high‑growth start‑ups in Manchester to heritage manufacturers in the Midlands, teams are discovering that structured play unlocks serious outcomes.
From Toy Box to Boardroom: Why LEGO Works
What makes LEGO different from a flip chart or a slide deck? Start with embodied cognition. Hands engaged in making stimulate the brain differently, encouraging connections that pure discussion rarely surfaces. Then consider metaphor. A tower leaning on a fragile arch may represent a risky product dependency; a moat around a minifigure can signify gatekeeping. These physical metaphors cut through jargon, pulling quiet perspectives into the centre.
There is also the democratic structure. Every participant builds. Every participant shares. No single voice dominates because the model sits in the middle and the story is co‑owned. That creates psychological safety without performative exercises. Costs are low; the fidelity is just high enough to provoke debate but not so polished that people fear critiquing it. Because the artefacts are temporary, teams feel free to challenge assumptions and iterate fast. The method scales too: five people around a table, or fifty across several tables, can converge in under two hours with a shared, testable picture of reality.
Inside a LEGO Session: Mechanics, Roles, and Flow
A typical session runs on rhythm. Short builds. Focused sharing. Clear rules. It begins with warm‑ups to loosen stiff hands and stiff hierarchies. Then comes a challenge: “Build the current customer journey,” “Model the blockers to delivery,” or “Show what great collaboration looks like here.” People build individually first, then describe the meaning of each element. Stories matter more than shapes.
Next, the group combines models into a shared system. Interactions are negotiated: where does risk sit, what depends on what, who actually decides? Facilitators time‑box and probe: “What does this brick represent?” “What happens if this link breaks?” Notes, photos, and concise labels capture the language that emerges. Roles are simple: a facilitator to hold the process, a sponsor to define the outcome, and participants to think with their hands. No slides, few rules, but absolute focus on meaning. By the last sprint, teams test scenarios, redesign the system, and pull actions into a short, visible backlog. Meetings after that get shorter because the picture is finally shared.
Evidence and Outcomes: What Companies Report
Hard data on “play” can sound fluffy. The field results are not. Organisations report faster decisions, fewer circular meetings, and clearer ownership of risks. In post‑session surveys, teams often cite improved cross‑functional collaboration and sharper prioritisation. Leadership likes the speed: you can elicit a candid view of culture in 90 minutes without anonymous forms or consultant‑speak. The crucial shift is alignment: people see the same system, name the same constraints, and commit to the same next steps. Below is a snapshot of typical outcomes UK teams track after running LEGO sessions.
| Objective | What Changes in Session | Typical Outcome in 60–90 Days |
|---|---|---|
| Break silos | Shared model exposes handoffs, blockers, and hidden dependencies | Fewer rework loops; clearer ownership of interfaces |
| Clarify strategy | Metaphors surface competing narratives and missing measures | Slimmer priorities; measurable goals attached to stories |
| Accelerate onboarding | New hires build “how work really flows” with veterans | Faster ramp‑up; less reliance on tribal knowledge |
| Resolve conflict | Models externalise tension; critique stays with bricks, not people | Calmer debates; agreements written as system changes |
How to Get Started Without a Facilitator
You do not need a big budget to test the approach. Start with one box of mixed bricks, a timer, and a crisp question. Set ground rules: everyone builds, everyone tells the story, respect time boxes, no phones. Warm up with quick prompts: “Build your week in three bricks.” Then tackle a real challenge: “Build the riskiest bet in our roadmap.” Have each person explain meaning. No interpretation by others; ask only clarifying questions.
Combine models into a shared landscape and agree on three experiments to run. Photograph everything; give elements short labels. Translate insights into actions: owners, dates, measures. Keep the session to 90 minutes; energy beats exhaustiveness. Treat the bricks as a thinking tool, not a toy pile. If you like the results, bring in a certified LEGO Serious Play facilitator for deeper strategy work, or weave 20‑minute build sprints into regular stand‑ups. The aim is rhythm, not spectacle; small, frequent builds sustain the gains.
What began in the playroom has become a quiet revolution in the meeting room. By turning ideas into something you can touch, teams cut through ambiguity and bias, surfacing issues that often hide in plain sight. The method is inclusive. It is fast. It respects the intelligence of the group while giving it shape. When people build together, they decide together—and they act faster. If your next away day could actually change how your organisation works on Monday morning, why not trade trust falls for bricks and see what your team builds next?
Did you like it?4.5/5 (26)